The Cosmopolitan Blog

- It’s my nationality, my philosophy… and my favorite drink!
  • Home
  • About CosmoChick
  • Poll Archives
  • Email

Is the US More Sexist or More Racist?

May 29, 2008 | 5:03 pm

In a post back in January, when there were still more than 2 candidates in each party for the US elections, i predicted that if either Hillary or Obama became the party nominee, then the Democrats would loose the general election and the next president would be a republican.

I still stand by this statement. See, I always asked the question “is the US more sexist or racist”. We think this question no longer applies, since 1/2 of america is voting for a black man and the other 1/2 for a woman and one would think the answer is that it’s pretty much equal. But that’s not true, it still very much applies: now that we know our opponent is McCain, who is more electable and likely to win against him, a woman or a black man? So again, I ask the question “is the US more sexist or more racist”?

I personally always thought America was more ready to elect a woman than a black man. After all, this is a country where there a still TWO schools that have some sort of racial segregation.

My personal viewpoint is that, by nature, the Democrats are more likely to accept a minority lead them. So they are more likely to accept a black man. But when it comes to the elections, we may also be looking at a whole bunch of republicans and undecided, who DON’T want to vote for McCain. Will they vote for Barack? I don’t think they will. And in that case, I feel that maybe Clinton should be McCain’s opponent, I think that a republican is more likely to vote for a woman than a black man.

This is absolutely 100% my opinion and understanding of this country from what i hear, what i observe, having lived there and having most of my friends and family still living there. Now, i want to hear what you think. Feel free to post a comment or two. Or answer the poll question on the right. Is the US more sexist or more racist?

Similar Posts on this Blog:

  • US politics… like it or not, you gotta care
  • Barak Obama’s Vice-President
  • No Appealing Republican Choice
  • Obama’s win - what it really means
  • Oprah just can’t win
Comments
No Comments »
Categories
General
Tags
barack, bush, clinton, democracy, democrats, gender, hillary, mccain, obama, politics, race, racist, republican, sex, sexist, usa
Trackback Trackback

My first boycott

April 15, 2008 | 4:00 pm

Well, i never considered myself an anarchist, but here you have it. I’m boycotting something. I’m boycotting CNN. Their tag line is “the most trusted name in news”. Seriously? How can we trust you, if you refuse to acknowledge that there are other countries out there. Dear CNN, did you know that the world does not, actually, revolve around the USA? That there are a few billion of us who don’t actually give a damn if we miss yet another Obama/Clinton debate? That taking a break from reporting on the primaries to spend 7 days talking about the New York governor’s affair is not actually good news reporting?

I used to fervently believe that Obama was the best democratic choice. Politics used to fascinate me. And now, CNN has single-handedly managed to turn me off politics. Maybe it’s cuz i’m generation X and i have the attention span of a goldfish, but seriously, a contest that lasts over 6 months, really, i promise you, looses steam very, very quickly.

Here is my plea to CNN, in the name of cosmopolitanism. We live on Earth. Earth is comprised of many countries. Each country, believe it or not, has newsworthy events. In order to up the awareness and IQ of your people, reporting on what is happening in other countries might actually be a good thing. Oh, and then, if you even spend just 10 minutes per hour reporting on what else is happening around the world, well then, maybe you could make a bold claim like being “the most trusted name in news”… And no, good looking anchors like Anderson Cooper not longer dissipate my anger.

But what makes me so mad (you know, like even MADDER than i was in the paragraph above!), and, unfortunately, i can’t really blame it on CNN, is the fact that i feel like we’re the only ones to see that the longer the democrats fight it out, the more power they’re giving to the republicans. I made a prediction on this blog a few months back, and i continue to maintain it. At the time, there were other democratic candidates, and i had said, if either Hillary or Obama get the nomination, then i guarantee the next POTUS will be a republican. I still believe that. Only time will tell, but in this case, pleeeease can time just hurry the hell up?

Similar Posts on this Blog:

  • Is the US More Sexist or More Racist?
  • Barak Obama’s Vice-President
  • US politics… like it or not, you gotta care
  • When the shocking no longer shocks
  • Finally! My thoughts on “Sicko”
Comments
2 Comments »
Categories
The 'isms' I believe in
Tags
america, barack, boycott, clinton, cnn, countries, country, debate, democrat, hillary, news, obama, patience, politics, president of the united states, republican, usa, world
Trackback Trackback

Oprah just can’t win

February 4, 2008 | 7:35 pm

As you know, i’m a strong supporter of Oprah. I think she’s a smart, independent woman who has risen from a very difficult start, to a very influential person in today’s world. Am i proud of her because she’s a woman? Sure, woman are very “patriotic” that way, we stand together because many, many women in our history have fought real hard to give us the standing we can enjoy in most of the Western world today. Seeing the situation of women in the Middle East and Africa makes this fact even more obvious. BUT, at the same time, i would respect anyone with a story like Oprah’s, somehow who started from an unprivileged background to become one of the most successful people in their field.

So why does everyone always come down so hard on Oprah? I’m sure she doesn’t need me defending her, but seriously, do we really enjoy criticizing people who do well? You ask some people, and all they know of Oprah is some chat show host you went through her whole life having weight issues. NEWSFLASH! We haven’t discussed Oprah’s weight issues for years now, instead, her politics, her thoughts, her books, her charities, her movies… all of these things have been a lot more in the forefront than her weight issues in the 90s. So don’t give me the “well that’s all people talk about”, no they don’t! It’s what you choose to remember.

Now, the poor woman makes a choice and stands by a political candidate, and she gets grief for too?For one, if she didn’t make a choice, she would be criticized for not having the guts to take a stand. So, in case some of you hadn’t noticed, Oprah is a black woman. Turns out, 1 democratic candidate is a woman, the other is black. So how illogical is it for women across the country to criticize her for supporting Barack Obama and being unfaithful to women? Um, hello? So if she supported Hillary, we’d criticize her for supporting a white candidate??? So, let me get this right. She doesn’t express her opinion, she gets shot down. She DOES express her opinion, she gets shot down… man, sux to be a prominent figurehead.

For one, i think she is an amazing role model. She teaches us not to follow her blindly, instead, she gives us the tools to empower yourselves, as women, as citizens of the world, as human beings. If you could put aside your sarcasm and opinionated mindset, you might find that you can relate to a few things that Oprah has to say. Don’t vote for Barack Obama because Oprah supports him. Don’t vote for Hillary because she’s a woman like you. For Pete’s sake, women voters! Do what you do best. Combine your logic and your intuition and LISTEN to both messages. Then find which one rings truer to your situation and your heart. Judge them not for their gender or the color of their skin, we’ve evolved, we’re smart human beings, we are better judges of character than that… and stop judging Oprah for her choices and weight issues.

I’ll stop preaching now…

Similar Posts on this Blog:

  • Oprah’s Favorite Things
  • The difference between neutrality and objectivism…
  • US politics… like it or not, you gotta care
  • My Beijing Olympics Rant
  • Sex and the City - chickflick on steroids
Comments
No Comments »
Categories
The 'isms' I believe in
Tags
barack, canada, celebrities, celebrity, chat, clinton, democratic, democrats, gossip, hillary, news, obama, opinion, oprah, politics, primetime, show, smart, states, united, US, usa, vote, voting, winfrey, woman, women
Trackback Trackback

US politics… like it or not, you gotta care

January 23, 2008 | 12:28 am

This is really not helping the general US ego. They already think that the world revolves around them, and now, what sucks is that the world does actually revolve around the US. The way they talk about the elections (ok, granted, i’m in Canada, it’s hardly very far away) on TV, you’d think it was everyone’s elections. I haven’t met someone who doesn’t know about Hillary and Barack. The republican race may be less known across the planet however, since the candidates haven’t yet been raised to celebrity status. Speaking of celebrities, i just heard that Fred Thompson (actor from Law and Order, that’s how i know him, anyway), just announced that he was dropping out of the race.

Last time around (2004), it was already bad enough, everywhere we looked there was a debate between Kerry and Bush, but at least, i feel like we were spared the primaries. And sure, in 2000, well, we all know that Bush rigged the votes and Al Gore should have been president, so, again, that had our attention.

But the primaries? Really? Seriously? We have to get involved this early in the process? It’s not, you realize, until this time next year, that the next president is sworn in… I heard on CNN that, during the New Hampshire primary, one of the voters expressed the fact that he wouldn’t vote, because he’s already so over it, and it’s overkill, he doesn’t want to go out and vote, so a bit of a backlash there.

I supposed the good news is, the more we spend time talking about the future president, the less W. is getting facetime… Which might explain why he hasn’t been feeling the love recently, and decided to give every US citizen and $800 tax rebate in the form of a check in their mailbox… Can someone say blackmail? Hey, W! You got a reputation and historical legacy you’re trying to salvage?

The thing is, like it or not, you gotta care. Like it or not, the news of possible US recession just sent the markets reeling this past week. The few shares I follow have hit rock bottom, and one’s not even in the US and is in one of the most stable industries you can get!

So, then, I ask you this. The question that’s on everyone’s lips: are Americans more racist or sexist? Are they more ready to vote for a woman or a Black man? Shame Oprah didn’t join the race, but seeing she’s Black AND she’s a woman, I think THAT, somehow is still a decade away (in my estimate) from being acceptable in such a bigotted, conservative and puritan country.

Personally, i think they’re more ready for a woman, although Barack has my Canadian vote. But here’s the truth. I honestly don’t think they’re ready for either. That is, they WILL pick either the woman or the black man, and that person will be the party’s nominee. But when it comes down to voting for the leader of the free world, my opinion is, come November 08, the Americans will chicken out, and decide not to vote for the Democrat candidate, they won’t want the woman or the Black man, and, therefore, by default, the votes will go to the Republican nominee.

So here it is: I predict that the next president of the United States will be a Republican again.

Anyway, whether you’re glued to your TV set or whether you wish the US would disappear off the face of the planet for a while, let me know what you think. There’s a new poll up (see right hand side), i hope you vote, you can select up to 5 answers.

Similar Posts on this Blog:

  • Is the US More Sexist or More Racist?
  • No Appealing Republican Choice
  • Barak Obama’s Vice-President
  • Oprah just can’t win
  • Obama’s win - what it really means
Comments
No Comments »
Categories
The 'isms' I believe in
Tags
and, barack, Bill, celebrities, celebrity, clinton, crash, democrat, economics, economy, edwards, elections, Fred, free, George W Bush, guiliani, hillary, huckabee, independant, john, Kerry, Law, leader, mccain, mike, mitt, obama, opinion, Order, politics, president, republican, romney, rudy, shares, stocks, Thompson, US, world
Trackback Trackback

New Post Notification

Feed Reader Subscription:
  Entries RSS Feed
  Comments RSS Feed

Email Subscription:
   

Categories

  • General
  • The 'isms' I believe in
  • The Art of Blogging
  • The Food
    • Food Musings
    • Restaurant Reviews
  • The Places
  • Tthat's Hot!
  • Twitter Updates

My Online Presence

Twitter  del.icio.us  Digg  StumbleUpon  LiveJournal  YouTube  Dailymotion  Vimeo  MySpace  Last.fm  Zooomr  Utterz  Pownce  VIRB°  Flickr  Yahoo! ID My Google Reader Shared Items Tumblr Feed Now Public Profile Blog Catalog Profile Zimbio Profile Technorati Profile  My Deezer Profile My Seeqpod Playlist

Weekly Poll: Vote now

China Olympics

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Calendar

August 2008
M T W T F S S
« Jul    
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Archives

  • August 2008 (3)
  • July 2008 (1)
  • June 2008 (4)
  • May 2008 (14)
  • April 2008 (14)
  • March 2008 (3)
  • February 2008 (7)
  • January 2008 (16)
  • November 2007 (2)
  • October 2007 (9)
  • August 2007 (7)
  • July 2007 (16)

Search

Simply enter your search term(s) in the box below and hit "Enter"

Blogroll

  • @YourSide
  • Astral Marketing
  • L’Arcane B&B
  • Observer Blog
  • World Ehtnic Food

More Info

Food & Drink Blogs - Blog Top Sites

 
 
 
rss Comments rss valid xhtml 1.1 design by jide powered by Wordpress get firefox